Pārlūkprogrammas paplašinājums
Atbalsta Chrome
SATURA RĀDĪTĀJS
Uzrakstiet atbildi
Nav pieejamu komentāru
Nav pieejamu komentāru
Crompt AI emuārs — viedāks saturs sākas šeit
Apgūstiet pārbaudītas metodes, satura stratēģijas un AI sasniegumus, kas uzlabos jūsu rakstīšanas efektivitāti un atraisīs jūsu pilno radošo potenciālu.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi
Gemini 3.1 Pro is Google's flagship reasoning-optimized AI model, released on February 19, 2026. Unlike speed-focused models, it is built for complex tasks requiring deep logic, step-by-step thinking, and multi-layered problem solving.
Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 77.1% on the ARC-AGI-2 benchmark, making it the industry leader in abstract reasoning. It also scored 94.3% on Expert Science — the highest among all 2026 AI models.
Thinking Level is a unique parameter that lets you manually control how deeply the model reasons before responding. You can set it to Low, Medium, High, or Max depending on how complex your task is. This feature is available on Crompt AI, where you can adjust it in real time.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leads in abstract reasoning (77.1% vs 52.9%) and has a larger context window (1M vs 500k tokens). GPT-5.2 is faster and more conversational. On Crompt AI, you can run both models side by side on the same prompt to see which one fits your workflow.
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports a 1 million token input context window with 64,000 output tokens. This means it can process an entire codebase or a 1,000-page document in a single pass.
Gemini 3.1 Pro is available on Google AI Studio (free tier), Google AI Pro (~$20/month), and Crompt AI. Crompt AI is the most cost-effective option — starting at ~$4.37, you get access to Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT-5.2, and Claude 4.6 all in one interface.
Yes. Gemini 3.1 Pro supports agentic "vibe coding," meaning you can build apps and generate interactive outputs directly from prompts. On Crompt AI, you can preview generated code snippets in real time, side by side with your prompt.
Lasīt vairāk emuāru
Why "Avoid X" Prompts Make AI Models Do Exactly X
"Don't sound like AI." Three words that almost guarantee AI-sounding output. Not because the model is ignoring you. Because of exactly how it reads your instruction. The word "don't" is grammatically present but semantically invisible. What follows is activated, not suppressed. Studies across thousands of prompts show negative constraints backfire more than half the time. The fix is not complicated, but it is counterintuitive. This piece shows you the pattern and exactly how to break it.
Devin AI Explained: How Scott Wu Built a $2B Autonomous Coding Agent
Everyone in the AI space keeps announcing “the future of coding,” but most tools are still autocomplete with a fresh layer. Devin enters a different discussion, at least according to teams using it. Cognition AI claims work that once took three months can now finish in a weekend. Built by competitive programming champion Scott Wu, Devin relies on reinforcement learning to plan tasks, fix its own mistakes, write tests, and deploy with minimal guidance. This piece looks at its architecture, the failure cases demos skip, and how to judge when letting Devin touch real production code is actually worth it.
How AI Models Compress Long-Form Reasoning Into Final Answers
AI models often generate thousands of hidden reasoning steps before giving a short reply. What you see in seconds is the result of layered reasoning, compression, and careful engineering behind the scenes. This guide breaks down how long-form LLM thinking is distilled into fast, reliable answers without sacrificing accuracy. You’ll discover the trade-offs, benchmarks, and production strategies teams use to balance latency, cost, and depth, and why understanding this pipeline changes how you build with AI.
Komentāri (0)